35 Ml of Caster Sugar to Pounds Conversion
Question:
How many pounds of caster sugar in 35 milliliters? How much are 35 ml of caster sugar in pounds?
The answer is:
35 milliliters of caster sugar is equivalent to 0.0652 pounds(*)
Volume to 'Weight' Converter
Milliliters of caster sugar to pounds Chart
Milliliters of caster sugar to pounds | ||
---|---|---|
26 milliliters of caster sugar | = | 0.0484 pounds |
27 milliliters of caster sugar | = | 0.0503 pounds |
28 milliliters of caster sugar | = | 0.0522 pounds |
29 milliliters of caster sugar | = | 0.054 pounds |
30 milliliters of caster sugar | = | 0.0559 pounds |
31 milliliters of caster sugar | = | 0.0578 pounds |
32 milliliters of caster sugar | = | 0.0596 pounds |
33 milliliters of caster sugar | = | 0.0615 pounds |
34 milliliters of caster sugar | = | 0.0633 pounds |
35 milliliters of caster sugar | = | 0.0652 pounds |
Milliliters of caster sugar to pounds | ||
---|---|---|
35 milliliters of caster sugar | = | 0.0652 pounds |
36 milliliters of caster sugar | = | 0.0671 pounds |
37 milliliters of caster sugar | = | 0.0689 pounds |
38 milliliters of caster sugar | = | 0.0708 pounds |
39 milliliters of caster sugar | = | 0.0727 pounds |
40 milliliters of caster sugar | = | 0.0745 pounds |
41 milliliters of caster sugar | = | 0.0764 pounds |
42 milliliters of caster sugar | = | 0.0782 pounds |
43 milliliters of caster sugar | = | 0.0801 pounds |
44 milliliters of caster sugar | = | 0.082 pounds |
Note: some values may be rounded.
FAQs on caster sugar weight to volume conversion
35 milliliters of caster sugar equals how many pounds?
35 milliliters of caster sugar is equivalent 0.0652 pounds.
How much is 0.0652 pounds of caster sugar in milliliters?
0.0652 pounds of caster sugar equals 35 milliliters.
Weight to Volume Conversions - Cooking Ingredients
References:
Notes on ingredient measurements
It is a bit tricky to get an accurate food conversion since its characteristics change according to humidity, temperature, or how well packed the ingredient is. Ingredients that contain the terms sliced, minced, diced, crushed, chopped add uncertainties to the measurements. A good practice is to measure ingredients by weight, not by volume so that the error is decreased.
Disclaimer
While every effort is made to ensure the accuracy of the information provided on this website, neither this website nor its authors are responsible for any errors or omissions. Therefore, the contents of this site are not suitable for any use involving risk to health, finances or property.