680 Ml of Sugar to Pounds Conversion

Question:
How many pounds of sugar in 680 milliliters? How much are 680 ml of sugar in pounds?

The answer is:
680 milliliters of sugar is equivalent to 1.27 ( ~ 1 1/4) pounds(*)

Volume to 'Weight' Converter

I need to convert ...

volume ? Enter the volume measurement quantity. The calculator accepts fractional values such as: 1/2 (half), 1/3 (1 third), etc.
unit ? Choose the volume unit (cup, l, ml, etc.)
of
to
ingredient ? Choose an ingredient, or a substance, by typing its name in the box on the left.
unit ? Choose the unit of mass (weight). Then click on the 'Calculate!'

Results:

680 milliliters of sugar equals 1.27 ( ~ 1 1/4) pounds. (*)
(*) To be more precise, 680 milliliters of sugar is equal to 1.2743 pounds. All figures are approximate.

Milliliters of sugar to pounds Chart

Milliliters of sugar to pounds
590 milliliters of sugar = 1.11 pounds
600 milliliters of sugar = 1.12 pounds
610 milliliters of sugar = 1.14 pounds
620 milliliters of sugar = 1.16 pounds
630 milliliters of sugar = 1.18 pounds
640 milliliters of sugar = 1.2 pounds
650 milliliters of sugar = 1.22 pounds
660 milliliters of sugar = 1.24 pounds
670 milliliters of sugar = 1.26 pounds
680 milliliters of sugar = 1.27 pounds
Milliliters of sugar to pounds
680 milliliters of sugar = 1.27 pounds
690 milliliters of sugar = 1.29 pounds
700 milliliters of sugar = 1.31 pounds
710 milliliters of sugar = 1.33 pounds
720 milliliters of sugar = 1.35 pounds
730 milliliters of sugar = 1.37 pounds
740 milliliters of sugar = 1.39 pounds
750 milliliters of sugar = 1.41 pounds
760 milliliters of sugar = 1.42 pounds
770 milliliters of sugar = 1.44 pounds

Note: some values may be rounded.

FAQs on sugar weight to volume conversion

680 milliliters of sugar equals how many pounds?

680 milliliters of sugar is equivalent 1.27 ( ~ 1 1/4) pounds.

How much is 1.27 pounds of sugar in milliliters?

1.27 pounds of sugar equals 680 milliliters.

Notes on ingredient measurements

It is a bit tricky to get an accurate food conversion since its characteristics change according to humidity, temperature, or how well packed the ingredient is. Ingredients that contain the terms sliced, minced, diced, crushed, chopped add uncertainties to the measurements. A good practice is to measure ingredients by weight, not by volume so that the error is decreased.

Disclaimer

While every effort is made to ensure the accuracy of the information provided on this website, neither this website nor its authors are responsible for any errors or omissions. Therefore, the contents of this site are not suitable for any use involving risk to health, finances or property.