2/3 Pounds of Icing Sugar to Ml Conversion
Questions: How many milliliters of icing sugar in 2/3 pounds? How much is 2/3 pounds of icing sugar in ml?
The answer is: 2/3 pounds of icing sugar is equivalent to 573 milliliters(*)
'Weight' to Volume Converter
Pounds of icing sugar to milliliters Chart
Pounds of icing sugar to milliliters | ||
---|---|---|
0.5767 pounds of icing sugar | = | 495 milliliters |
0.5867 pounds of icing sugar | = | 504 milliliters |
0.5967 pounds of icing sugar | = | 513 milliliters |
0.6067 pounds of icing sugar | = | 521 milliliters |
0.6167 pounds of icing sugar | = | 530 milliliters |
0.6267 pounds of icing sugar | = | 538 milliliters |
0.6367 pounds of icing sugar | = | 547 milliliters |
0.6467 pounds of icing sugar | = | 556 milliliters |
0.6567 pounds of icing sugar | = | 564 milliliters |
0.667 pounds of icing sugar | = | 573 milliliters |
Pounds of icing sugar to milliliters | ||
---|---|---|
0.667 pounds of icing sugar | = | 573 milliliters |
0.6767 pounds of icing sugar | = | 581 milliliters |
0.6867 pounds of icing sugar | = | 590 milliliters |
0.6967 pounds of icing sugar | = | 599 milliliters |
0.7067 pounds of icing sugar | = | 607 milliliters |
0.7167 pounds of icing sugar | = | 616 milliliters |
0.7267 pounds of icing sugar | = | 624 milliliters |
0.7367 pounds of icing sugar | = | 633 milliliters |
0.7467 pounds of icing sugar | = | 641 milliliters |
0.7567 pounds of icing sugar | = | 650 milliliters |
Note: some values may be rounded.
FAQs on icing sugar volume to weight conversion
2/3 pounds of icing sugar equals how many milliliters?
2/3 pounds of icing sugar is equivalent 573 milliliters.
How much is 573 milliliters of icing sugar in pounds?
573 milliliters of icing sugar equals 2/3 ( ~
Weight to Volume Conversions - Cooking Ingredients
References:
Notes on ingredient measurements
It is a bit tricky to get an accurate food conversion since its characteristics change according to humidity, temperature, or how well packed the ingredient is. Ingredients that contain the terms sliced, minced, diced, crushed, chopped add uncertainties to the measurements. A good practice is to measure ingredients by weight, not by volume so that the error is decreased.
Disclaimer
While every effort is made to ensure the accuracy of the information provided on this website, neither this website nor its authors are responsible for any errors or omissions. Therefore, the contents of this site are not suitable for any use involving risk to health, finances or property.